Eminence Global ACT-72 Model

Eminence Global ACT-72 Model

The ACT-72 Model – A Precision Approach to the 72-Hour PR Blitz

In today’s fast-paced media landscape, brands must seize control of their narrative within a crucial 72-hour window to maximize visibility, engagement, and reputation impact. The ACT-72 Model (Assess → Communicate → Transform) is a strategic, data-driven framework designed to deliver a high-impact PR blitz within a three-day cycle.

Traditional PR strategies often take weeks to roll out, leading to missed opportunities and diminished engagement. The ACT-72 Model leverages a rapid-cycle approach, integrating real-time data analytics, AI-driven media placement, and digital amplification to maximize brand reach and influence within a short time frame.

 

The Three-Phase Structure of ACT-72

Phase 1: ASSESS (0–12 Hours) – Strategic Planning & Market Analysis

Data-Driven Market Analysis – AI sentiment tracking determines public perception.

Competitor Benchmarking – Evaluates brand positioning vs. competitors.

Audience Targeting & Segmentation – Defines key messaging per demographic.

Media Outlet Identification – Pinpoints the most effective distribution channels.

Phase 2: COMMUNICATE (12–36 Hours) – Content Deployment & Media Saturation

High-Impact Story Development – Engaging narratives crafted for mass appeal.

Multi-Platform Execution – Press releases, social media, TV/radio interviews.

Influencer & Media Partnerships – Leveraging credibility for rapid engagement.

Viral Amplification Strategies – Paid and organic media saturation tactics.

Phase 3: TRANSFORM (36–72 Hours) – Impact Measurement & Optimization

Performance Analytics – Tracking KPIs (reach, engagement, sentiment shift).

Adaptive Content Refinement – Tweaks in messaging based on real-time feedback.

SEO & Digital Footprint Enhancement – Ensuring long-term visibility.

Sustained Engagement Strategies – Follow-up content and retargeting campaigns.

Background: Crisis at a Leading Tech Firm Scenario: A globally recognized technology company experienced a data breach, exposing millions of user accounts. Within hours, negative press coverage surged, causing customer trust to plummet and stock prices to drop by 12%. Challenges: Widespread negative sentiment on social media and news platforms. Competitor firms leveraging the crisis to gain market share. Immediate loss of investor confidence and declining stock value. Legal scrutiny and regulatory inquiries into the company’s data protection policies. ACT-72 Solution Implementation The ACT-72 Model (Assess → Communicate → Transform) was deployed to regain control of the narrative and mitigate the damage within 72 hours. Phase 1: ASSESS (0–12 Hours) – Crisis Evaluation & Data Analysis Mathematical Model - Sentiment Impact Analysis S(t)=S0e−kt+R(t)S(t) = S_0 e^{-kt} + R(t) where: S(t) represents sentiment over time. S_0 is the initial negative sentiment surge. k is the decay constant influenced by PR interventions. R(t) is the corrective response function applied via ACT-72. Key Actions: AI-driven sentiment tracking identified peak negative perception. Benchmarking analysis against previous tech crises determined best response strategies. Identification of high-risk media outlets spreading misinformation. Key spokesperson selection and media coaching to ensure message consistency. Phase 2: COMMUNICATE (12–36 Hours) – Narrative Control & Media Saturation Mathematical Model - Engagement Acceleration Function E(t)=δ∫0tV(x)dxE(t) = \delta \int_{0}^{t} V(x)dx where: E(t) is total audience engagement over time. \delta represents engagement amplification factor. V(x) accounts for virality and shareability potential. Key Actions: Multi-platform communication strategy executed across TV, radio, social media, and print. Crisis transparency: CEO hosted a live Q&A addressing security measures. Influencer & expert partnerships for credibility reinforcement. Paid & organic content saturation strategies ensured dominance in digital conversations. Phase 3: TRANSFORM (36–72 Hours) – Reputation Restoration & Long-Term Impact Mathematical Model - Reputation Recovery Curve P(t)=P0+∫0t[αS(x)+βC(x)+γA(x)]dxP(t) = P_0 + \int_{0}^{t} [\alpha S(x) + \beta C(x) + \gamma A(x)]dx where: P(t) represents public perception at time t. P_0 is the baseline reputation before the crisis. S(x), C(x), A(x) are sentiment control, crisis communication, and audience engagement factors. \alpha, \beta, \gamma are optimization coefficients ensuring long-term reputation gain. Key Actions: SEO-driven content ensured positive narratives outranked crisis news. Sustained engagement plans, including security updates and transparency reports. Strategic ad placement showcasing proactive security reforms. Stakeholder & investor relations campaign rebuilding trust in financial markets. Results & Impact within 72 Hours Stock value rebounded by 9% due to regained investor confidence. Negative sentiment dropped by 65% after targeted PR interventions. Media narrative shifted from "crisis" to "company’s rapid response success." Competitor advantage neutralized through proactive engagement and message control. Conclusion: The Power of ACT-72 in Crisis Management By leveraging ACT-72’s rapid-response model and mathematical optimization, the tech firm successfully contained reputational damage, restored market confidence, and redefined crisis management excellence in a high-stakes situation. most innovative PR Firm in The World

The ACT-72  Mathematical Model Application Optimizing the 72-Hour PR Blitz

To holistically elevate a brand and curb a crisis within 72-hrs record time, we have developed sub-models to measure the Impact of PR optimization to drive better results necessary to exert industry authority. PR without Data is hearsays.

1. PR Blitz Effectiveness Function (PBEF)

A unique function to measure the effectiveness of a 72-hrs PR Blitz over time.

P(t)= αSt+βC(t)+γA(t)

where:

  • P(t) represents overall PR impact over time,
  • S(t) is strategic planning efficiency,
  • C(t) is communication effectiveness,
  • A(t) is audience engagement,
  • \alpha, \beta, \gamma are optimization coefficients to maximize impact.

Key Insights from PBEF

  • Higher S(t) ensures a well-prepared, data-driven PR response.
  • Stronger C(t) reflects clarity, authenticity, and transparency in communication.
  • Increased A(t) translates to viral reach, engagement, and public sentiment shift.

Optimization coefficients adjust based on crisis severity and market response.

The objective is to optimize P(t) by maximizing strategic planning, rapid communication, and audience activation within the 72-hour window.

2. Engagement Acceleration Function (EAF)

The Engagement Acceleration Function (EAF) is a mathematical model designed to measure and optimize audience engagement in PR campaigns. It quantifies the impact of strategic communication over time, ensuring maximum virality and sustained engagement.

Engagement Assessment Model, Eminence Global PR Firm, Engagement Acceleration Function (EAF), ACT-72 MOdel, PR Blitzwhere:

  • E(t) represents engagement over time.
  • \delta is the engagement amplification factor, influencing how effectively content spreads.
  • V(x) accounts for the virality potential and shareability of the campaign content.
  • ∫ \int denotes cumulative exposure impact, measuring how engagement accumulates over time.
Key Components of EAF
  1. Engagement Amplification Factor (\delta)
    • Represents how well the campaign structure enhances audience interaction.
    • Influenced by factors like influencer collaboration, timing, and audience targeting.
  2. Virality Potential (V(x))
    • Measures how likely content is to be shared across different platforms.
    • Includes metrics such as share rate, retweets, reposts, and organic recommendations.
  3. Cumulative Exposure Impact (\int V(x)dx)
    • Represents the total engagement reach over a period.
    • Ensures sustained interaction rather than momentary spikes in visibility.

By strategically adjusting \alpha, \beta, \gamma, and \delta, ACT-72 ensures a PR campaign reaches peak influence within 72 hours and sustains its visibility thereafter.

The ACT-72 PIOF Formula For 72-Hours PR Blitz

This formula is designed to maximize public relations effectiveness within a short timeframe by balancing strategy, communication, and audience engagement.

The ACT-72  Mathematical Model Application Optimizing the 72-Hour PR Blitz

USING PR IMPACT OPTIMIZATION FORMULA (PIOF) FOR ACT-72 Model

P=(Cr×M)+ST×RP = \frac{(C_r \times M) + S}{T \times R}P=T×R(Cr​×M)+S​

Where:

  • P = PR Blitz Effectiveness Score (a numerical indicator of the success of the PR Blitz within 72 hours).
  • C_r = Crisis Severity Rating (rated on a scale of 1–10 based on initial analysis).
  • M = Media Impact Factor (the reach and engagement score of media responses, including press, social media, and online publications).
  • S = Stakeholder Sentiment Shift (percentage change in positive sentiment, measured via surveys, comments, and social media sentiment tools).
  • T = Time Spent on Response (measured in hours for each ACT phase, with a target of ≤72).
  • R = Resource Efficiency Factor (cost-effectiveness and resource allocation, measured as a ratio of cost to media engagement and sentiment recovery).
Breakdown of the PIOF Model Variables
  1. Crisis Severity Rating (C_r)
  • Assign an initial score (1–10) based on the potential reputational damage and urgency of the crisis.
  • Higher scores indicate more severe crises.
  1. Media Impact Factor (M)
  • Measure the total reach, impressions, and engagement of media responses (weighted by platform effectiveness).
  • For example: M=(Press Reach)+(Social Media Engagement)+(Broadcast Coverage Reach).M = \text{(Press Reach)} + \text{(Social Media Engagement)} + \text{(Broadcast Coverage Reach)}.M=(Press Reach)+(Social Media Engagement)+(Broadcast Coverage Reach).
  1. Stakeholder Sentiment Shift (S)Background: Crisis at a Leading Tech Firm Scenario: A globally recognized technology company experienced a data breach, exposing millions of user accounts. Within hours, negative press coverage surged, causing customer trust to plummet and stock prices to drop by 12%. Challenges: Widespread negative sentiment on social media and news platforms. Competitor firms leveraging the crisis to gain market share. Immediate loss of investor confidence and declining stock value. Legal scrutiny and regulatory inquiries into the company’s data protection policies. ACT-72 Solution Implementation The ACT-72 Model (Assess → Communicate → Transform) was deployed to regain control of the narrative and mitigate the damage within 72 hours. Phase 1: ASSESS (0–12 Hours) – Crisis Evaluation & Data Analysis Mathematical Model - Sentiment Impact Analysis S(t)=S0e−kt+R(t)S(t) = S_0 e^{-kt} + R(t) where: S(t) represents sentiment over time. S_0 is the initial negative sentiment surge. k is the decay constant influenced by PR interventions. R(t) is the corrective response function applied via ACT-72. Key Actions: AI-driven sentiment tracking identified peak negative perception. Benchmarking analysis against previous tech crises determined best response strategies. Identification of high-risk media outlets spreading misinformation. Key spokesperson selection and media coaching to ensure message consistency. Phase 2: COMMUNICATE (12–36 Hours) – Narrative Control & Media Saturation Mathematical Model - Engagement Acceleration Function E(t)=δ∫0tV(x)dxE(t) = \delta \int_{0}^{t} V(x)dx where: E(t) is total audience engagement over time. \delta represents engagement amplification factor. V(x) accounts for virality and shareability potential. Key Actions: Multi-platform communication strategy executed across TV, radio, social media, and print. Crisis transparency: CEO hosted a live Q&A addressing security measures. Influencer & expert partnerships for credibility reinforcement. Paid & organic content saturation strategies ensured dominance in digital conversations. Phase 3: TRANSFORM (36–72 Hours) – Reputation Restoration & Long-Term Impact Mathematical Model - Reputation Recovery Curve P(t)=P0+∫0t[αS(x)+βC(x)+γA(x)]dxP(t) = P_0 + \int_{0}^{t} [\alpha S(x) + \beta C(x) + \gamma A(x)]dx where: P(t) represents public perception at time t. P_0 is the baseline reputation before the crisis. S(x), C(x), A(x) are sentiment control, crisis communication, and audience engagement factors. \alpha, \beta, \gamma are optimization coefficients ensuring long-term reputation gain. Key Actions: SEO-driven content ensured positive narratives outranked crisis news. Sustained engagement plans, including security updates and transparency reports. Strategic ad placement showcasing proactive security reforms. Stakeholder & investor relations campaign rebuilding trust in financial markets. Results & Impact within 72 Hours Stock value rebounded by 9% due to regained investor confidence. Negative sentiment dropped by 65% after targeted PR interventions. Media narrative shifted from "crisis" to "company’s rapid response success." Competitor advantage neutralized through proactive engagement and message control. Conclusion: The Power of ACT-72 in Crisis Management By leveraging ACT-72’s rapid-response model and mathematical optimization, the tech firm successfully contained reputational damage, restored market confidence, and redefined crisis management excellence in a high-stakes situation. most innovative PR Firm in The World
  • Calculate the change in sentiment from negative to neutral/positive during the 72-hour window.
  • Measured as a percentage: S=Positive Sentiment After Response−Initial Negative Sentiment
  • Initial Sentiment×100S = \frac{\text{Positive Sentiment After Response} – \text{Initial Negative Sentiment}}{\text{Initial Sentiment}} \times 100S=Initial Sentiment
  • Positive Sentiment After Response−Initial Negative Sentiment​×100
  1. Time Spent (T)Background: Crisis at a Leading Tech Firm Scenario: A globally recognized technology company experienced a data breach, exposing millions of user accounts. Within hours, negative press coverage surged, causing customer trust to plummet and stock prices to drop by 12%. Challenges: Widespread negative sentiment on social media and news platforms. Competitor firms leveraging the crisis to gain market share. Immediate loss of investor confidence and declining stock value. Legal scrutiny and regulatory inquiries into the company’s data protection policies. ACT-72 Solution Implementation The ACT-72 Model (Assess → Communicate → Transform) was deployed to regain control of the narrative and mitigate the damage within 72 hours. Phase 1: ASSESS (0–12 Hours) – Crisis Evaluation & Data Analysis Mathematical Model - Sentiment Impact Analysis S(t)=S0e−kt+R(t)S(t) = S_0 e^{-kt} + R(t) where: S(t) represents sentiment over time. S_0 is the initial negative sentiment surge. k is the decay constant influenced by PR interventions. R(t) is the corrective response function applied via ACT-72. Key Actions: AI-driven sentiment tracking identified peak negative perception. Benchmarking analysis against previous tech crises determined best response strategies. Identification of high-risk media outlets spreading misinformation. Key spokesperson selection and media coaching to ensure message consistency. Phase 2: COMMUNICATE (12–36 Hours) – Narrative Control & Media Saturation Mathematical Model - Engagement Acceleration Function E(t)=δ∫0tV(x)dxE(t) = \delta \int_{0}^{t} V(x)dx where: E(t) is total audience engagement over time. \delta represents engagement amplification factor. V(x) accounts for virality and shareability potential. Key Actions: Multi-platform communication strategy executed across TV, radio, social media, and print. Crisis transparency: CEO hosted a live Q&A addressing security measures. Influencer & expert partnerships for credibility reinforcement. Paid & organic content saturation strategies ensured dominance in digital conversations. Phase 3: TRANSFORM (36–72 Hours) – Reputation Restoration & Long-Term Impact Mathematical Model - Reputation Recovery Curve P(t)=P0+∫0t[αS(x)+βC(x)+γA(x)]dxP(t) = P_0 + \int_{0}^{t} [\alpha S(x) + \beta C(x) + \gamma A(x)]dx where: P(t) represents public perception at time t. P_0 is the baseline reputation before the crisis. S(x), C(x), A(x) are sentiment control, crisis communication, and audience engagement factors. \alpha, \beta, \gamma are optimization coefficients ensuring long-term reputation gain. Key Actions: SEO-driven content ensured positive narratives outranked crisis news. Sustained engagement plans, including security updates and transparency reports. Strategic ad placement showcasing proactive security reforms. Stakeholder & investor relations campaign rebuilding trust in financial markets. Results & Impact within 72 Hours Stock value rebounded by 9% due to regained investor confidence. Negative sentiment dropped by 65% after targeted PR interventions. Media narrative shifted from "crisis" to "company’s rapid response success." Competitor advantage neutralized through proactive engagement and message control. Conclusion: The Power of ACT-72 in Crisis Management By leveraging ACT-72’s rapid-response model and mathematical optimization, the tech firm successfully contained reputational damage, restored market confidence, and redefined crisis management excellence in a high-stakes situation. most innovative PR Firm in The World
  • Evaluate the total time allocated to each phase (Assess, Communicate, Transform) to ensure swift execution.
  1. Resource Efficiency Factor (R):
  • Measure the ratio of total costs spent on PR Blitz activities to the output (media reach and sentiment recovery).
  • A more efficient campaign has a lower R, improving the overall score P.

 

How PIOF Reflects ACT-72

  1. Assess Phase (Hours 0–12)
    • Determine C_r and gather baseline data for M and S.
  2. Communicate Phase (Hours 12–36)
    • Monitor M (media reach and engagement) as press releases, social media, and interviews are deployed.
    • Track sentiment shifts (S) as stakeholders respond.
  3. Transform Phase (Hours 36–72)
    • Refine M and maximize S.
    • Use final data to calculate P, reflecting the overall campaign effectiveness.

Case Study 1 Using the Model ACT-72 Model in Crisis Management

Background: Crisis at a Leading Tech Firm Scenario: A globally recognized technology company experienced a data breach, exposing millions of user accounts. Within hours, negative press coverage surged, causing customer trust to plummet and stock prices to drop by 12%. Challenges: Widespread negative sentiment on social media and news platforms. Competitor firms leveraging the crisis to gain market share. Immediate loss of investor confidence and declining stock value. Legal scrutiny and regulatory inquiries into the company’s data protection policies. ACT-72 Solution Implementation The ACT-72 Model (Assess → Communicate → Transform) was deployed to regain control of the narrative and mitigate the damage within 72 hours. Phase 1: ASSESS (0–12 Hours) – Crisis Evaluation & Data Analysis Mathematical Model - Sentiment Impact Analysis S(t)=S0e−kt+R(t)S(t) = S_0 e^{-kt} + R(t) where: S(t) represents sentiment over time. S_0 is the initial negative sentiment surge. k is the decay constant influenced by PR interventions. R(t) is the corrective response function applied via ACT-72. Key Actions: AI-driven sentiment tracking identified peak negative perception. Benchmarking analysis against previous tech crises determined best response strategies. Identification of high-risk media outlets spreading misinformation. Key spokesperson selection and media coaching to ensure message consistency. Phase 2: COMMUNICATE (12–36 Hours) – Narrative Control & Media Saturation Mathematical Model - Engagement Acceleration Function E(t)=δ∫0tV(x)dxE(t) = \delta \int_{0}^{t} V(x)dx where: E(t) is total audience engagement over time. \delta represents engagement amplification factor. V(x) accounts for virality and shareability potential. Key Actions: Multi-platform communication strategy executed across TV, radio, social media, and print. Crisis transparency: CEO hosted a live Q&A addressing security measures. Influencer & expert partnerships for credibility reinforcement. Paid & organic content saturation strategies ensured dominance in digital conversations. Phase 3: TRANSFORM (36–72 Hours) – Reputation Restoration & Long-Term Impact Mathematical Model - Reputation Recovery Curve P(t)=P0+∫0t[αS(x)+βC(x)+γA(x)]dxP(t) = P_0 + \int_{0}^{t} [\alpha S(x) + \beta C(x) + \gamma A(x)]dx where: P(t) represents public perception at time t. P_0 is the baseline reputation before the crisis. S(x), C(x), A(x) are sentiment control, crisis communication, and audience engagement factors. \alpha, \beta, \gamma are optimization coefficients ensuring long-term reputation gain. Key Actions: SEO-driven content ensured positive narratives outranked crisis news. Sustained engagement plans, including security updates and transparency reports. Strategic ad placement showcasing proactive security reforms. Stakeholder & investor relations campaign rebuilding trust in financial markets. Results & Impact within 72 Hours Stock value rebounded by 9% due to regained investor confidence. Negative sentiment dropped by 65% after targeted PR interventions. Media narrative shifted from "crisis" to "company’s rapid response success." Competitor advantage neutralized through proactive engagement and message control. Conclusion: The Power of ACT-72 in Crisis Management By leveraging ACT-72’s rapid-response model and mathematical optimization, the tech firm successfully contained reputational damage, restored market confidence, and redefined crisis management excellence in a high-stakes situation. most innovative PR Firm in The World

Scenario: CEO Scandal Crisis

  1. Input Variables
    • C_r = 8 (Severe due to CEO’s public image implications).
    • M = 250,000 (Total reach from press, social media, and TV).
    • S = 60% (Shift from 20% positive sentiment initially to 80% positive).
    • T = 72 (Full 72-hour implementation).
    • R = 0.8 (Cost/resource allocation ratio, derived from $40,000 campaign costs with 50,000 effective engagements).
  2. Calculate
  • P=(8×250,000)+6072×0.8=2,000,06057.6=34,725.35P = \frac{(8 \times 250,000) + 60}{72 \times 0.8} = \frac{2,000,060}{57.6} = 34,725.35P=72×0.8(8×250,000)+60​=57.62,000,060​=34,725.35

Interpretation:  A P-Score of 34,725 reflects a high-impact PR Blitz with excellent resource use and strong media sentiment recovery.

Case Study 2 Using the Eminence Global ACT-72 Model in Crisis Management

Scenario: Crisis at a Leading Tech Firm

A globally recognized technology company experienced a data breach, exposing millions of user accounts. Within hours, negative press coverage surged, causing customer trust to plummet and stock prices to drop by 12%.

Challenges
  • Widespread negative sentiment on social media and news platforms.
  • Competitor firms leveraging the crisis to gain market share.
  • Immediate loss of investor confidence and declining stock value.
  • Legal scrutiny and regulatory inquiries into the company’s data protection policies.
ACT-72 Solution Implementation

The ACT-72 Model (Assess → Communicate → Transform) was deployed to regain control of the narrative and mitigate the damage within 72 hours.

Phase 1: ASSESS (0–12 Hours) – Crisis Evaluation & Data Analysis
Mathematical Model – Sentiment Impact Analysis

S(t)=S0e−kt+R(t)S(t) = S_0 e^{-kt} + R(t) where:

  • S(t) represents sentiment over time.
  • S_0 is the initial negative sentiment surge.
  • k is the decay constant influenced by PR interventions.
  • R(t) is the corrective response function applied via ACT-72.

Key Actions:

  • AI-driven sentiment tracking identified peak negative perception.
  • Benchmarking analysis against previous tech crises determined best response strategies.
  • Identification of high-risk media outlets spreading misinformation.
  • Key spokesperson selection and media coaching to ensure message consistency.
Phase 2: COMMUNICATE (12–36 Hours) – Narrative Control & Media Saturation
Mathematical Model – Engagement Acceleration Function

E(t)=δ∫0tV(x)dxE(t) = \delta \int_{0}^{t} V(x)dx where:

  • E(t) is total audience engagement over time.
  • \delta represents engagement amplification factor.
  • V(x) accounts for virality and shareability potential.
Key Actions
  • Multi-platform communication strategy executed across TV, radio, social media, and print.
  • Crisis transparency: CEO hosted a live Q&A addressing security measures.
  • Influencer & expert partnerships for credibility reinforcement.
  • Paid & organic content saturation strategies ensured dominance in digital conversations.
Phase 3: TRANSFORM (36–72 Hours) – Reputation Restoration & Long-Term Impact
Mathematical Model – Reputation Recovery Curve

P(t)=P0+∫0t[αS(x)+βC(x)+γA(x)]dxP(t) = P_0 + \int_{0}^{t} [\alpha S(x) + \beta C(x) + \gamma A(x)]dx where:

  • P(t) represents public perception at time t.
  • P_0 is the baseline reputation before the crisis.
  • S(x), C(x), A(x) are sentiment control, crisis communication, and audience engagement factors.
  • \alpha, \beta, \gamma are optimization coefficients ensuring long-term reputation gain.
Key Actions
  • SEO-driven content ensured positive narratives outranked crisis news.
  • Sustained engagement plans, including security updates and transparency reports.
  • Strategic ad placement showcasing proactive security reforms.
  • Stakeholder & investor relations campaign rebuilding trust in financial markets.
Results & Impact within 72 Hours
  • Stock value rebounded by 9% due to regained investor confidence.
  • Negative sentiment dropped by 65% after targeted PR interventions.
  • Media narrative shifted from “crisis” to “company’s rapid response success.”
  • Competitor advantage neutralized through proactive engagement and message control.

Implementation Strategy Using ACT-72 Optimization

  • AI-Powered Sentiment & Trend Monitoring: Ensures real-time assessment and content adaptation.
  • Real-Time Media Synchronization: Multi-platform execution at peak engagement times.
  • Targeted Narrative Engineering: Creating messages that trigger emotional and viral responses.
  • Multi-Channel Content Saturation: Ensures brand dominance across digital and traditional platforms.

Key Differentiators of the ACT-72 Model

ACT-72 MODEL By Eminence Global PR, Public Relations, New PR Formula, Innovation, Best PR Firm in The World

  1. Speed + Precision – Immediate execution with AI-optimized messaging.
  2. Data-Driven Adaptability – Dynamic campaign adjustments based on engagement analytics.
  3. Multi-Layered Impact Strategy – Blending traditional media, digital PR, and influencer outreach.
  4. Holistic Transformation – Brand transformation across all board
  5. Scalability – Adaptable for brands of all sizes across global markets.

 

The Power of ACT-72 in Crisis Management

By leveraging ACT-72’s rapid-response model and mathematical optimization, the tech firm successfully contained reputational damage, restored market confidence, and redefined crisis management excellence in a high-stakes situation.

ACT-72 MODEL By Eminence Global PR, Public Relations, New PR Formula, Innovation, Best PR Firm in The WorldRedefining PR Blitz Campaigns

The ACT-72 Model introduces a groundbreaking approach to fast-impact, high-reach PR execution, merging real-time analytics, strategic storytelling, and viral media tactics to dominate the media landscape in just 72 hours. Brands adopting this model gain a competitive edge in an ever-evolving media ecosystem.

Contact Eminence Global for an Exclusive Consultation or to get trained on on ACT-72 Implementation.

ACT-72 MODEL By Eminence Global PR, Public Relations, New PR Formula, Innovation, Best PR Firm in The World